The
groups drive to deliver new capacity and ensure that its build programme
is on time will be founded on a sound corporate governance environment
As Eskoms operating environment becomes more challenging, the importance of superior governance practices is even more pronounced. The groups drive to deliver new capacity and ensure that its build programme is on time will be founded on a sound corporate governance environment that ensures fundamental principles are not compromised in times of operational pressure. As such, management performance measures include achieving Eskoms objectives efficiently and timeously without compromising its commitment to accountability, fairness, transparency and responsibility.
This approach ensures that Eskom regularly reviews its processes and practices for legal compliance, uses funds in an economic, efficient and effective manner and adheres to good corporate governance practices which are continually benchmarked against international standards, and appropriate to its circumstances.
The statutory duties, responsibilities and liabilities imposed on the directors of Eskom by the Companies Act, 61 of 1973 as amended, are augmented by those contained in the Public Finance Management Act, 1 of 1999 (PFMA), as amended. Eskom is also guided by the King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2002 (King II Report), as well as the Protocol on Corporate Governance in the Public Sector 2002.
Key initiatives during the period to ensure continued compliance with good corporate governance included:The board acknowledges the importance of ongoing improvement in this critical area, such as initiatives to improve stakeholder participation and effective reporting and disclosure to stakeholders.
![]() |
| Rural electrification |
![]() |
| Recommissioning in progress on the generation floor at Camden power station |
The compact is not intended to interfere in any way with the normal principles of company law. The relationship between the shareholder and the board is preserved, as the board is responsible for ensuring that proper internal controls are in place and that Eskom is effectively managed. The compact promotes good governance practices in Eskom by helping to clarify the respective roles and responsibilities of the board and the shareholder and ensuring there is agreement on Eskoms mandate and key objectives.
Eskom has a unitary board structure comprising 13 non-executive directors and two executive directors. The majority of non-executive directors are independent.
Directors, appointed by the Minister of Public Enterprises, are drawn from diverse backgrounds (local and international) and represent the demographics of the Republic of South Africa. The directors bring a wide range of experience and professional skills to the board.
Eskoms articles of association stipulate that the shareholder will, after consulting with the board, appoint the chairman, chief executive and non-executive directors of the company. The executive directors are appointed by the board, after obtaining approval from the shareholder.
The term of office of a non-executive director does not exceed a period of three years. Non-executive directors retire by rotation and are eligible for re-election.
TN Msomi, SV Zilwa and SE Funde retired by rotation in July 2005. LCZ Cele, U Nene and M Bello were appointed as independent, non-executive directors in August 2005.
R Khoza retired as the chairman of Eskom in July 2005 and MV Moosa was appointed in his stead as independent, non-executive chairman in August 2005.
The terms of office of the remaining non-executive directors expired at the annual general meeting in 2005. As they were eligible for re-election, they were re-appointed for a further three-year period.
Executive directors are permanent employees in terms of Eskoms conditions of service. The chief executives term of office is three years.
Meetings of the board are scheduled annually in advance. Special meetings are convened when required to address specific material issues. Teleconferencing facilities are available to directors or members of committees unable to attend meetings. During the reporting period, eight board meetings were held. The attendance of members at board meetings is reflected below.
| Apr1 | Jun | Sep | Oct1 | Oct | Dec | Feb | Mar | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 |
| RJ Khoza2, 3 (chairman) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
| VM Moosa2, 4 (chairman) | n/a | n/a | ||||||
| MF Baleni2 | A | |||||||
| M Bello2, 4 | n/a | n/a | A | A | ||||
| LCZ Cele2, 4 | n/a | n/a | ||||||
| BM Count2 | A | |||||||
| SE Funde2, 3 | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| TS Gcabashe5 | ||||||||
| LG Josefsson2 | A | A | A | |||||
| WE Lucas-Bull2 | A | A | A | A | A | |||
| PM Makwana2 | A | A | A | A | A | |||
| JRD Modise2 | ||||||||
| AJ Morgan2 | ||||||||
| SA Mpambani2 | ||||||||
| TN Msomi3, 6 | A | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| U Nene2, 4 | n/a | n/a | A | |||||
| B Nqwababa5 | ||||||||
| VM Rowjee2 | ||||||||
| SV Zilwa2, 3 | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 1. | Special meeting. |
| 2. | Independent non-executive director. |
| 3. | Retired July 2005. |
| 4. | Appointed August 2005. |
| 5. | Executive director. |
| 6. | Non-executive director. |
| Present. | |
| A | Absent with apologies. |
In keeping with good corporate governance practices, the board has developed a board charter and identified its role.
The board’s role is as follows:
|
![]() |
| Liveline team hard at work |
![]() |
| Pilot scale combustion test facility |
The performance of the board committees is evaluated against their respective terms of reference. The human resources, remuneration and ethics committee facilitates the evaluation of senior management.
Continuous training is provided, on request, to meet the needs of each director or group of directors. Directors are also continually updated on new laws and regulations.
Refer to the directors' report for further information on directors remuneration.
The company secretary, together with the assurance functions in the corporate division, monitors Eskoms compliance with the requirements of the PFMA, Companies Act and other relevant legislation; and reports to the board in this regard.
The committee monitors compliance with relevant legislation and ensures an appropriate system of internal control is maintained to protect Eskoms interests and assets. It reviews the activities and effectiveness of the corporate audit department (internal audit). It is also responsible for evaluating the independence, objectivity and effectiveness of the external auditors and for reviewing accounting and auditing concerns identified by internal and external audit. The head of the corporate audit department and the external auditors have unrestricted access to the chairman of the committee, and to the chairman of Eskom. The committee reviews the accuracy, reliability and credibility of statutory financial reporting and recommends the annual financial statements and the annual report of the Eskom group, as presented by management and reviewed by the external auditors, for approval by the board.
| Audit committee | |||||||
| Jun | Jun | Aug | Oct1 | Nov | Dec1 | Mar | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 |
| JRD Modise (chairman) | |||||||
| LCZ Cele2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||
| LG Josefsson | A | A | A | ||||
| PM Makwana | A | A | A | A | A | A | |
| SA Mpambani | A | ||||||
| TN Msomi3 | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Seven committee meetings were held during the review period. These were attended by the external auditors, the finance director, the head of the corporate audit department and relevant corporate officials. Attendance of members at committee meetings is reflected above.
The committee ensures that the company’s risk management strategies and processes are aligned with best practices.
Three meetings were held during the year, dealing with the integrated risk management strategy and processes, risk tolerance and appetite, risk accountabilities, major risk exposures and emerging risk issues. Attendance of members at these meetings is reflected below.
| Jun | Nov | Mar | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 |
| SE Funde (chairman)3 | n/a | n/a | |
| AJ Morgan (chairman)4 | |||
| JRD Modise | |||
| M Bello2 | n/a | A | A |
| B Nqwababa | A | ||
| EN Matya | A |
| 1. |
Special meeting. |
| 2. |
Appointed August 2005. |
| 3. | Retired July 2005. |
| 4. | Appointed as chairman August 2005. |
| Present. | |
| A | Absent with apologies. |
The committee monitors and oversees the financial health of Eskom, including the review of budgets and financial and business plans. Eight committee meetings were held during the period. Attendance of members at these meetings is reflected below.
| Investment and finance committee | ||||||||
| May | Jun | Aug | Sep1 | Nov | Jan1 | Mar | Mar1 | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 |
| WE Lucas-Bull (chairman) | A | |||||||
| M Bello2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | A | A | A | A | A |
| BM Count | A | |||||||
| SE Funde3 | A | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| TS Gcabashe | A | A | ||||||
| LG Josefsson4 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| AJ Morgan | ||||||||
| U Nene2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | A | A | A | ||
| B Nqwababa | A | A | ||||||
The committee assists the board in making procurement decisions, approves
procurement policies, tenders and contracts within its delegated authority
and ensures that Eskom’s procurement system and processes are fair,
transparent, competitive and cost effective.
Seven committee meetings were held during the period. Attendance of members
at committee meetings is reflected below.
| Tender committee | |||||||
| Apr1 | May | Aug | Nov | Dec1 | Mar | Mar1 | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 |
| MF Baleni (chairman) | |||||||
| LCZ Cele2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | A | |||
| AJ Morgan | |||||||
| SE Mpambani | |||||||
| VM Rowjee |
| 1. | Special meeting. |
| 2. | Appointed August 2005. |
| 3. | Retired July 2005. |
| 4. | Resigned September 2005. |
| Present. | |
| A | Absent with apologies. |
The chairman ensures sufficient time is allocated to each of the areas within the terms of reference of the committee. In particular, there are dedicated slots for ethics, human resources policies, executive remuneration and succession planning.
Five meetings were held during the period. The attendance of members at these meetings is reflected below. The former chairman of the committee, Mr RJ Khoza, attended the August meeting to effect a seamless transfer of the chairmanship to Mr PM Makwana.
| Human resources, remuneration and ethics committee | |||||
| May | Aug | Oct1 | Nov | Mar | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 |
| RJ Khoza (chairman)2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||
| PM Makwana (chairman)3 | |||||
| BM Count | |||||
| TS Gcabashe | |||||
| VM Rowjee |
| Sustainability committee | |||
| May | Aug | Mar | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 |
| RJ Khoza (chairman)2 | n/a | n/a | |
| MF Baleni (chairman)3 | |||
| SE Funde2 | A | n/a | n/a |
| TS Gcabashe | A | ||
| LG Josefsson4 | n/a | ||
| WE Lucas-Bull4 | n/a | n/a | A |
| MV Moosa4 | n/a | n/a | |
| TN Msomi2 | A | n/a | n/a |
| U Nene4 | n/a | n/a | |
| VM Rowjee5 | n/a | n/a |
| 1. |
Special meeting. |
| 2. |
Retired July 2005. |
| 3. |
Appointed as chairman August 2005. |
| 4. |
Appointed August 2005. |
| 5. |
Co-opted member for August 2005. |
| 6. |
These are divisional managing directors and not directors of the company. |
| Present. | |
| A | Absent with apologies. |
The committee was established in June 2005 to assist with Eskoms contribution to the electricity distribution industry restructuring process. It assists the board in developing strategic positions regarding this process.
Four meetings were held during the period. Attendance of members at these meetings is reflected below.
| Ad hoc electricity distribution industry restructuring committee (EDI committee) | ||||
| Aug | Sept | Nov | Jan | |
| Members | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 |
| AJ Morgan (chairman) | ||||
| MF Baleni | ||||
| TS Gcabashe | A | |||
| JRD Modise | ||||
| B Nqwababa | A | |||
![]() |
| Re-taping the harness of a high voltage transformer at Rotek |
The committee assists the chief executive in guiding and controlling the overall direction of the business and in exercising executive control. It is responsible for ensuring the effective management of the day-to-day operations of the business.
Exco is assisted in carrying out its delegated duties by its procurement, operations, investment and sustainability subcommittees.
Twenty-seven Exco meetings were held during the period. Two of these were strategic workshops. Attendance of members at these meetings is reflected below.
| Executive management committee | |||||||
| Attendance | |||||||
| Members | (27 meetings held) | ||||||
| TS Gcabashe (chairman) | 26 | ||||||
| NL Angel1 | 20 | ||||||
| BA Dames | 27 | ||||||
| JA Dladla | 24 | ||||||
| SJ Lennon | 26 | ||||||
| ME Letlape | 23 | ||||||
| PJ Maroga | 25 | ||||||
| EN Matya | 25 | ||||||
| PD Mbonyana | 22 | ||||||
| M Ntsokolo | 25 | ||||||
| B Nqwababa | 26 | ||||||
|
The PFMA focuses on financial management with related outputs and responsibilities. Eskom has an ongoing process of awareness, education and advice on the PFMA to the business.
Directors comply with their fiduciary duties as set out in the PFMA. The responsibilities of the board, in terms of the PFMA, include taking appropriate action to ensure: The process of risk management, including a related system of internal
control, is the responsibility of the board. Management is
accountable to the board for the design, implementation and monitoring of
the process of risk management, and integrating risk management into the
day-to-day activities of the organisation.
Risk accountability is defined by the risk accountability matrix, which is periodically updated to ensure relevance. Risk categories defined in the matrix include finance, technical, environmental, legal, human resources, information, stakeholders, regulatory and strategic. Each category has separate subcategories that ensure all risk areas are covered, and promote effective risk identification and evaluation.
A methodology for determining major risk values has been defined. This will assist the organisation to better identify which risks should receive priority and will show the value of risk mitigation measures. Aligned to this valuation methodology are risk tolerance levels for the organisation and risk appetite parameters for each functional risk area. A tolerance level for the organisation has been proposed and is currently being refined before implementation. Refer to the directors report for information regarding Eskoms major risks.
Eskom continues to align itself with the recommendations of the King II guidelines, and has adopted the Institute of Risk Management South Africa’s Code of Practice. Interaction with Eskom’s corporate audit and technical audit departments is essential to the ongoing success of the integrated risk management strategy, particularly risk integration aspects between divisions, subsidiaries and functions. Specific attention is given to Eskom’s top ten risks when preparing audit plans. |
The ethics office, a section of the risk management department, endeavours to inculcate a high standard of ethical conduct in the Eskom group. It assists the chief executive in setting the framework, rules, standards and boundaries for ethical behaviour.
This is achieved through an ethics management programme, based on King II recommendations and other best-practice initiatives.
Priorities addressed during the financial year included:Both management and the corporate audit department closely monitor controls and actions taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.
![]() |
| Koeberg nuclear power station profiled against Table Mountain |
![]() |
| Safety check in progress for liveline work |
The corporate audit department is fully supported by the board and audit committee, and has full, unrestricted access to all organisational activities, records, property and personnel.
The external auditors are responsible for independently auditing and reporting on the financial statements in conforming with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Audit programmes are based on one-and three-year cycles. Additional safety, health, environmental, quality and technical risk audits, reviews, assessments and incident investigations are conducted.
The security risk management department was established to provide a cost-effective risk-based approach to address threats of crime and irregularity against Eskom. This includes strategies of crime prevention, detection, response and investigation that support business objectives.
Where serious fraud, corruption and irregularities are suspected and reported, forensic investigations (a section of security risk management) investigate and establish the facts to enable management to deal appropriately with the issues, and to prevent recurrence.
Eskom has a formal and continuous programme of engaging with specific groups of stakeholders and addressing issues that are critical to the execution of its business strategy.
| Stakeholder engagement | |||
| Stakeholder issues identified and the response strategy and control measures include: | |||
| Issue | Response strategy/control measures | ||
| National electricity | | Embarked on build and return-to-service programme to increase capacity | |
| supply constraints | | Refurbishment and network-strengthening projects under way to enhance | |
| quality of supply | |||
| | Western Cape recovery plan implemented | ||
| Appropriate planning | | A robust planning process is in place that is annually reviewed and updated with | |
| procedures to enable | expected changes in supply and demand | ||
| Eskom to manage | | Planning process is aligned to that of the Department of Minerals and Energy | |
| future challenges | and Nersa | ||
| | Follows a process of public participation with environmental impact assessments | ||
| Management and | | Consolidating and optimising existing skills and resources | |
| retention of critical | | Source critical skills from multiple sources, with a focus on BEE | |
| skills | | Internal training and development programmes and recruitment practices | |
| focuses on building skills base | |||
| | Eskom Learning Institutions increased intake of students | ||
| Safety standards and | | Renewed focus area from top management and down into organisation | |
| the prevention of | | Electrical safety awareness initiatives implemented to educate the public about the | |
| fatalities | dangers of electricity inside and outside the home | ||
| | Renewed focus on behavioural safety programmes to address vehicle fatalities | ||
| | Quality of job observations and safe working procedures improved | ||
| Comprehensive | | Maintenance practices, procedures and programmes refocused to take account | |
| maintenance of assets | of ageing critical plant | ||
| | Focus on enhancing engineering, operating and maintenance skills | ||
| | Pipelining of sufficient critical staff for the future has been accelerated through | ||
| recruitment and training initiatives | |||
| | Large maintenance partners included to ensure skills are focused on priorities | ||
| such as quality assurance | |||
| Management of HIV and | | Manages impact of HIV and Aids through integrated response strategies. | |
| Aids among employees | | Strategies which aim to empower employees through self-awareness, education | |
| and training, care and support, high risk areas, policies and practices, information | |||
| management, communication and partnerships | |||
| | Special focus on Voluntary Counselling and Testing | ||
| | Employee assistance programmes in place | ||
| Minimising environmental | | Environmental management system implemented to ensure continual | |
| impact | improvement in managing the impacts on the environment | ||
| | Environmental management an integral part of decision and business processes | ||
| | An environmental help-line allows both internal and external stakeholders to | ||
| engage with Eskom on environmental issues | |||
| Affordable and | | Eskom supports the Nersa objective of safeguarding the interests of customers | |
| sustainable tariffs | and is committed to fair pricing and consultation with the Nersa |
||
| | Eskom intends to keep the price of electricity as low as possible, combined with | ||
| a pricing policy that ensures gradual, stable and predictable price increases | |||
Eskom regularly reviews the effectiveness of its stakeholder programme. This includes surveying stakeholders to understand shifts in perceptions and needs. During the review period, Eskom commissioned an independent research consultancy, African Institute of Corporate Citizenship, to facilitate two formal sessions with stakeholders for feedback on the 2005 Eskom annual report and the process of reporting to stakeholders in general. It was encouraging that the overall response was positive. Many of the issues raised spanning economic, social and environmental concerns have been addressed in this report.
Eskom will continue to make every effort to enhance this engagement process and address stakeholder issues and requirements.
To present a balanced and understandable assessment of its position, Eskom continually strives to ensure that reporting and disclosure to stakeholders is relevant, clear and effective. The organisation emphasises integrated reporting on economic, environmental and social matters, as well as being transparent in addressing both positive and negative aspects. Local and international guidelines for sustainability reporting, including the Global Reporting Initiative (2002) and King II, are used in compiling the annual report.
The 2005 annual report was independently benchmarked against best practice in integrated sustainability reporting to ensure continual improvement and relevance of information reported. The findings and recommendations were considered in preparing this annual report.
Eskom was benchmarked against 17 reports from South African and international energy, water and resource sectors, all acknowledged as leading examples of integrated sustainability reporting. Eight integrated reports from electricity utilities were included. The exercise highlighted several aspects, including:
|
Eskom identified the main stakeholders to whom it is accountable and who it expects to use this annual report. Primary and secondary stakeholders were identified in the preparation of the report.
Eskom engages with stakeholders in a variety of ways, including:The co-ordination and determination of Eskoms strategic direction on sustainability, including environment, occupational hygiene and safety is undertaken through the Eskom sustainability, environment and occupational hygiene and safety liaison committees.
Eskoms safety, health and environmental policy, the National Environmental Management Act, 107 of 1998 and the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993, remain the guiding principles for achieving the groups occupational health, safety and environmental strategies and performance targets. The operations subcommittee of Exco monitors and assesses occupational hygiene, safety and environmental performance and reviews major incidents to ensure the necessary corrective measures are taken. Overall strategies are reviewed by the sustainability committee of the board.
Sustainability Liaison CommitteeThe Sustainability Liaison Committee makes recommendations on issues referred to it by the Exco sustainability subcommittee, the board sustainability committee or other Exco subcommittees and board committees, and on such issues identified by the committee as requiring comment. The committee debates and makes recommendations on Eskom's position or policy on sustainability matters, and provides appropriate guidance and direction on sustainability matters affecting Eskom and specific divisions.The committee reviews, debates and monitors performance and formulates strategies on a variety of sustainability matters, such as Eskom's sustainability performance indicators and the impact of legislation and policy (actual or proposed) on Eskom's sustainability performance, and gives input or comments on draft legislation and policy. It tables issues for consideration by the Exco sustainability subcommittee and the board sustainability committee. Subcommittees are established as needed to address specific issues relating to the committee’s responsibilities. The committee is chaired by the general manager–corporate sustainability. Principal members include senior managers or representatives from Eskom's divisions and the Eskom Development Foundation. Senior staff members representing environment, nuclear, quality, safety, economics and financial, health, risk and social responsibility are represented on the committee. Environmental Liaison CommitteeThis subcommittee of the Sustainability Liaison Committee has been established to give guidance on relevant policies and strategies for environmental issues within Eskom and its subsidiaries. The committee is represented by divisional environmental managers and representatives.It debates and makes recommendations on Eskom’s position or policy on all environmental matters and provides appropriate assurance, guidance and direction on environmental matters affecting Eskom. The committee reviews and deliberates the impact of environmental legislation and policy (actual or proposed) on Eskom’s environmental performance, and provides input/comments on draft legislation and policy. All contraventions of environmental legislation are reported to this committee. The requirements of the Eskom policy or position regarding the ISO 14001 environmental management system within Eskom are reviewed and discussed by the committee. It makes recommendations on Eskom environmental indicators. Occupational Health and Safety Liaison CommitteeThe aim of this committee is to:
|
Eskom has a three-tier system of nuclear safety governance, in line with international best practice. The first tier is the sustainability committee of the board, which dedicates a number of its meetings each year to nuclear considerations. These meetings are attended by a number of experienced international nuclear experts, thus bringing an international perspective to the committees deliberations. The second tier is the nuclear management committee, chaired by the managing director of the Generation division. This committee monitors, reviews and recommends for approval aspects of the Eskom nuclear business, including nuclear policy, standards and rules in relation to international standards and benchmarks and Eskoms overall business requirements. The third tier is the safety review group, a forum that brings together nuclear expertise from different parts of Eskom to debate and evaluate nuclear safety issues, and make appropriate recommendations to senior management and the higher tiers of committees.
The nuclear management committee consists of:
|
Eskoms contribution is centrally coordinated and facilitated through the office of the chief executive. Eskoms most significant contribution to Asgisa will continue to be through its core business of supplying affordable, reliable electricity, thereby facilitating economic growth. Eskom will also optimally leverage associated activities, including its current corporate social investment (CSI) programmes, for the development of the second economy.
These associated activities include:
|
Eskoms activities are aimed at contributing to the development of the disadvantaged where it operates. CSI activities include initiatives for skills development, job creation, education and health.
Many of Eskoms CSI initiatives are executed by the Eskom Development Foundation, a company established for this purpose.
| The Eskom Development Foundation’s mission is to contribute to the improvement of the quality of life of the disadvantaged through integrated, efficient and effective development programmes. |
The Eskom Development Foundation has a board of directors that uses various committees to manage the grant-making activities of the company.
There were no changes to the board during the period under review. At the annual general meeting, B Nqwababa was re-elected as shareholder representative.
The board committees met regularly during the period under review, and were effective.
The corporate audit department provides the internal audit function for Eskom Enterprises.